Browsed by
Month: April 2026

Too Many Lives to Count Part 1

Too Many Lives to Count Part 1

In the context of so many lives, none is all that meaningful. And yet I cling…

I have been reading Mae Neecha’s autobiography and her recollections of her own past lives really struck me. From them she is able to reflect on her tendencies and views that keep her coming back, for example returning to the world to ‘fix’ others she judges. She sees the perils of these habits of view so clearly: She talks about a friend staying with a loser husband because she thinks she owes him; even in one life it is clear how her friend’s belief causes her to return to that husband  again and again, despite the suffering he causes her. This is what we are all doing over countless lives – returning again and again, despite the suffering it causes us. Rebirth really is the ultimate peril.

I can’t recall my own past lives, but I decided to start thinking just about the many Alanas of my current life: Hippy Alana, Beloved by my Father Alana, Miss High School Goody Popular Alana, Yoga Alana, Hipster Body Building Alana, there was Prove my Worth With Many Lovers Alana, and then Prove my Virtue as Good and Dutiful Wife Alana…In one lifetime I have changed so much, assumed a sequence of identities that are not just changing, but are sometime diametrically opposed to other, older, versions of myself.

 And as I further consider all these Alanas, it is pretty clear their identities don’t lie ‘out there’ anywhere. They are in my head. They are my stories, my fantasies, my curations. I start with views about what I value, what it would be ‘good’, useful, desirable to be, or not be. Then I am the choosy narrator, curating particular ‘proof points’, memories, actions, belongings and relationships to help me assume and prove these many alanas.

All the while, I am not even honest with myself about what or who I am: I assign so much value to the image of someone on top and in control of my life, I can’t even control my body aging, I can’t even control my behaviors, growing agitated with my mother, or angry in NY, even while trying to claim myself a virtuous daughter, an equanimous, unflappable Buddhist.

These identities, they are forged by forces of habit, what I value based largely on what I am used to, what has proven useful in the past, what I have been exposed to. It’s really just arbitrary values I have picked up over the course of lives, norms dictated by the norms of the circumstances of my births. And for these identities, that are nothing but passing moments,  meaninglessly  dictated – by what I am exposed to, what I choose from habit – I work, I suffer, I mourn the loss of. Oh the hours of struggle to get the body shapes I needed for each identity, the time squandered on collecting and caring for objects, outfits, relationships that proved the particular me de jour.

There is a scene in the show The Witcher that hit me so powerfully when I saw it that it has stayed with me for years:  A girl, Yeniffer, is abused by her father, forced to live in a pig pen, and yet, when a stranger comes to take her away Yennifer is despondent.  As the viewer, we already know this stranger is actually someone who ultimately helps Yennifer find a better life.  I have often considered why it is that Yennifer is so reluctant to leave when she has such a shit life.

It’s a shit life, literally, filled with pig shit, but its ‘HERS’ what she is accustomed to. In the end, no one wants to lose what they have, no matter how meager it is. Human tendency is to cling even when letting go may offer us something better. I rather keep trying to be some rotating version of an alana than lose my sense of self, even through those identities, those births keep me mired in a shitty, painful, world.

The Law of Selectively Advantageous Instability

The Law of Selectively Advantageous Instability

I read an article in the news that really intrigued me. It was about a new biological law, the law of ‘selectively advantageous instability’. In sum, the law proposes that, “instability in biological systems, like cells, may be beneficial to our survival. Afterall, it is what lets animals adapt to new environments, it allows growth and repair as well. Unfortunately, this great biological advantage comes with a serious disadvantage: Cellular instability brings aging, wear and tear on the system and the tendency for mutations that cause cancer.  

In my early days studying at the Wat, my teachers used to emphasize that everything has two sides: This fact is just one face of impermanence. It is also, quite clearly, a face of dukkha as well. As I considered the article a bit more, it struck me how two-sidedness could even be hardwired into our biology, rupa: For life, a body, to form for a time, there needs to be instability, sickness and death.

I am someone who craves stability: Instability is fear provoking, dangerous, it is a state I associate with loss, sickness. Stability and survival are of course deeply intertwined, but they also exist on a continuum. More and less stability, more or less hospitableness to survival.  There actually does need to be enough instability to create a form, enough to keep the form adaptable to the environment — but not so much to lead to dissolution, ‘too much’ and poof, anatta.

This was really an aha moment for me: Since I started considering anatta, I realized it had to be just like impermanence and dukkha: Everything is impermanent, there is just longer and shorter duration.  Everything is dukkha, there are just different degrees. As I considered this biological law, I realized it is proof that everything is also anatta:

Afterall, everything is always shifting. Balancing between adapting and stabilizing. That is a constant as basic as the elements and nature. For physical birth to even happen there needs to be this interplay: Elements need to be adaptable enough to take the shape of a fetus, and then need to be stable enough in that form that it can be born before disaggregation. If we look at this through the lens of Mae Yo’s definition of atta –a clump—its pretty clear how atta also exists on a continuum, a continual tension between fixedness, stability, and flux, instability.

The problem is I get confused. I look at a form in less state of flux, or one in which I can at least identify continuity –a baby to a kid to an adult –and I assign it an identity. I see the sammutti I imagine and I superimpose an atta onto a continually moving form just because, for a time, there is less moving, more stability. Only when the instability gets to be so much that the form changes past my ability to credulously call it by its name, its samutti, its identity, I have to concede anatta.  

Of course though,  anatta has been there the whole time; a continual interplay between stability and flux that allowed for arising, and that preordains cessation. Form, clumping, stability is actually conditional on instability, and what is conditional can’t be self. Atta, identity, sammutti of objects must exist in my mind alone.

RSS
Follow by Email